Monday, July 29, 2024
Thursday, July 18, 2024
Friday, June 28, 2024
President Joe Biden is a true believer in America, but we need a younger candidate
President
@JoeBiden
is a great, a humble true lover of the U.S and an adherent to its institutions, however, when we call for a reconsideration for his nomination for a second term, we aren't denying his great achievements for the American people but rather refocusing our attention to the fact that the 2024 elections are so important that we cannot afford losing to a Maniac like
@realDonaldTrump
who is as clear as daylight that he will make himself an absolutist in Putin's or NK Kim's style where there is no freedom of speech has any place, and where the Legal System works for the dictator and his thugs. The majority of the American people have shown in polls after polls that they'd rather vote for a younger candidate. Let's assume that
@KamalaHarris
was the front runner with her youth and energy, and the fact that she could be the lady the American people were waiting for for a long time. President Biden did his great job since 2020 and I think that it is possible that the president is going through some health issues and he's worried about his son who could go to prison for a long time, which is again an evidence that the Republicans with Trump were lying when they accused President Biden of using the Justice Department to go after his his opponents. Republicans are obviously working on subverting the American Democratic System, and that's clear not just through the actions of the
@GOP
Senators and Representatives, but even though the Conservative Justices on the SCOTUS who are trying their utmost to establish a dictator with Full Immunity, probably more than a monarch ruling in God's name! I think that the President should rethink it thoroughly because he was not able to focus and even remember most of the major points that could have embarrassed Trump and his supporters on the debate stage, like the fact that they do support the enemies of the Free World such as Putin, that they have killed the Law that was prepared in Congress to fix the border just because Trump felt it would make him lose, and the fact that Republicans were calling for over a year to defund the
@FBI
and the law enforcement agencies, thus carelessly calling for the endangerment of the American people and opening the door for the Mexican Cartels and Islamic Terrorists to enter the USA. Please leave your comments below:
Sunday, April 16, 2023
Sunday, September 11, 2022
Republicans Complain that Biden Did Not Unify America! But who is Dividing it?
I was an avid American and a Republican even before arriving in the US in 2010. When I was a citizen of Iraq, where citizenship did not matter much, as you probably only needed it to get some nutritious food 🍲 or a job, and there were no elections whatsoever before 2003, my dream was to make Iraq like a smaller America, where people will have freedoms, free press, respect for human rights, etc.
However, that was impossible, of course, with the majority of the Iraqi people being highly religious and traditional. This failed state, thanks to Islamic rule, and thanks to the long reign of Arab-Fascism under the Baath regime, resembles America, which Republicans in general, and MAGA in specific, seek to achieve. Fascism cannot accept a genuine free market system, and thus, if Republicans would ever take power and abolish Democracy, then, they have to invent a form of Socialist economy that is controlled by the state. The MAGA regime, like Saddam's Baath party, and Hitler's Nazis, will have a system where the common man is crushed, and the big super-rich will enjoy the crushing of the workers' unions.
Back to our question regarding the part where many complain that President Biden did not unify the country, it is important to remember the real question: "Who is dividing America?" should be the question asked. Remember that every Fascist regime, and I have lived under one for 30 years, needs some sort of cult or religious "zeal" to avoid any kind of philosophical criticism, something even Atheistic Communist Regimes failed to do. I do remember how Saddam, the arrogant, ignorant, and dumb dictator, used to give religious hints regarding many of his political actions such as war campaigns, some increases in salaries, or even when the regime was facing difficulties because authoritarian regimes know that the majority, forced to "respect" religion, cannot talk. Now, MAGA makes a great appeal to religion, and many Republican senators and activists have said overwhelmingly that they believe that America was established based on "Biblical Principles", which is a total BS. Why it is BS? Because the constitution of the United States of America does not mention God, Allah, Jesus or the Bible or Muhammad or the Qur'an, or any other religious symbol. To put religion in politics or in the laws of the country, that act aims to intensify divisions and social strife because who is that who will decide which Church and which bible, and there are many of them, who will define the role of religion in the state. Imagine we are talking about these issues in the 21st century! The bringing of "religious freedoms" to the table by the Republicans actually aspires to create some form of hate towards #LGBTQ, towards others who have a different religion or different forms of Christian beliefs. and we should not forget how many Republicans did not like @SenatorRomney just because he is a Mormon. Now, President Biden is aware of the fact that you cannot accept in a Democracy, those who claim day and night that they accept election outcomes only when they win. I know that some dumb idiots would say that Hillary Clinton too did not accept the outcome of the 2016 election and that she was talking about a "stolen election" after she lost to Trump, but they ignore the fact that Hillary never ever said that the votes or the ballots ❎ were stolen or that the agency of a foreign power involved in the "steal". Hillary's complaint was about social media, the #FakeNews widely seen on #Facebook, #Twitter, and other platforms. Not just that, she did congratulate Trump the same night, even though she had more popular votes, so, she lost by states, not by the majority of the population. Now, the question is: Will we return to the age of hypocrisy and Racist compromises, when America accepted that half of 🌗 America should be slavery-based in a country that was claiming itself to be "the beacon of Freedom?" Or, we put Trump on trial and punish him for his crimes in an equal, justice for all system? Let us wait and see, with the hope that the American people will vote wisely.
Saturday, September 10, 2022
Thursday, September 8, 2022
Nick Adams @NickAdamsinUSA Proves that MAGAs are Seeking to Establish a Totalitarian Regime in America
Let us be honest. It is clear, as president Biden said on more than a few occasions that MAGA thugs are not hiding their shameless wish to, not just establish a corrupt norm, but even to designate a dictator who will enjoy all the pomp of the absolute totalitarian leaders of several countries that have 0 respect for the human rights of the people and the freedom to criticize the government. In the tweet above we notice several things:
Tuesday, September 6, 2022
Does Nick Adams @NickAdamsinUSA knows that Trump is Far More Dangerous for the US than Khamenei?
As usual, we find that the MAGA folks who work as sellers for Trump's racist project for America have no idea, or more probable, ignore reality in order to satisfy the Big Boss and that the fact that there are other evils, malicious terrorists on @Twitter, like Ayatollah Khamenei, #MBS of #SaudiArabia is undeniable. However, there are some things that MAGAs ignore such as:
1- #Twitter is a business and a private sector corporation, and by MAGA's claimed "principles" Twitter has the right to suspend whoever they think 🤔 deserves to be suspended. That is exactly what Twitter did to my account just because I expected that #Trump will expire in jail, like Al Capone. So in that regard, Nick and the MAGAs are mistaken.
2- MAGAs commit a common fallacy that which is called What-about-ism which reminds me of some radical Islamists whom whenever they stuck about one of (prophet Muhammad's crimes) they reply by saying: What about #Hitler and #Stalin? They have killed millions! As if such an argument would make the crimes of the founder of Islam morally acceptable! So, Trump and his mouthpieces reply to every legal accusation by saying: "What about Hillary?" Which is in itself is an acknowledgment of guilt, and of course, the Aristocratic Republican Party has no problem having two legal systems, one for the common subjects, and the second applies to the elite.
3- MAGA leaders and speakers depend on complaints of the American people without offering any solutions or ways to manage the suffering of the common American people. The bad news for MAGAs is that the American voters, mostly vote for Republicans as a way to punish the Democrats, but once they see how ugly is MAGA and its Fascism that is hiding behind #Jesus, they will not vote for them.
Monday, September 5, 2022
Leo Terrell: The Black Face of the White Nazi MAGA!
People like:
Former Defense Secretary James Mattis
Brigitte Gabriel @ACTBrigitte is One of the Dumbest MAGAs!
She is one of the dumbest MAGA Republicans I have ever seen, except for Trump for sure!
Take a look at this tweet from her:
First of all, she is dumb because, throughout all her tweets and posts, the only thing she's good at is making stupid propositions, such as this tweet above where she creates a failed comparison between Trump's chaotic presidency, where America was falling behind in healthcare, the rise of racial violence and hate. Not to mention the most serious threat to America, which was coming from Putin, and Trump's undermining of the importance of NATO alliance. For the dumb Brigette Gabriel, that disastrous presidency was "Greatness", whereas Joe Biden's hard work to save lives reminds her of 'nursing homes! Sure, under Biden's presidency we got a good sense of law and order, a sense of security as America, Europe, and all the free world is fighting side by side with the Ukrainian people against #Putin's evil war in #Ukrain! So, shut up your mouth Dumb Brigette!
Sunday, September 4, 2022
Monday, September 6, 2021
Are There “Islamic Feminists?” Some Fallacies in Arab Feminist Rooms on Clubhouse
By: Sohel Ahmed Bahjat
There are many awesome, Arab Feminist
ladies and girls on Clubhouse App who represent the Feminist Movement in the
Arab world, in general, and Iraq in specific. On Clubhouse and social media,
one finds easily a struggle going on between the forces of Enlightenment,
secularist groups, and women’s rights, versus the forces of Tradition, blind
obedience, and the worship of Islamic symbols, all trying to get the support of
society, which is, unfortunately, soaked in the Islamic myths, and belief
system.
What motivated me to the writing of this
article was an accusation I, and some other “male” secular colleagues, faced
from some other female activists, stating, and I’m paraphrasing it, that: “Male
Atheists adopt ‘women’s rights’ to reach our own agendas – as atheists – in
defeating and weakening “Islam” – as if Islam is a ‘person’ we hate - or the
religious elites behind it.” The
accusation, which went on, was adopted, partially, by some ladies who claimed
themselves to be “Muslim Reformists” who requested from us – male atheists – to
differentiate between Islam and women’s rights.
I, and my male friends, argued for the
following points:
1- It is impossible – and I emphasize the word “impossible” – for a
woman, living in Islamic countries, to obtain even her most basic rights such
as choosing her life partner, equality in inheritance – as a female receives
half of the male’s portion and her testimony in courts considered less than the
male’s testimony, and the freedom to decide how to live, which is not possible
under the patriarchal system of Islam that establishes inequality in Qur’anic
texts and the authenticated hadith [the sayings and the deeds of Muhammad].
Rather, females are killed under justifications such as honor with the most
ridiculous justifications for crimes that are “protected” by a law derived from
the Islamic religion.
2- The quest and the struggle over women’s liberation is linked to the
struggle against Islamic fascism, and any attempt to separate between the two –
women’s rights and the expulsion of religious authority from political power –
is an absurd attempt, could be like turning the trial of a male rapist into a
matter of “distorted culture” and nothing more. This separation serves the
(Arab-Kurdish-Turkish) Nationalist Islamic trend embracing the dress of
religion, which is constantly waging campaigns to undermine and demonize
secular feminists, in general, (such campaigns include insults that reflect the
baseness and fall of religious education.)
3- One of the feminist ladies, kindly stated that “there are also
‘masculine’ atheists and secularists, which means that the feminist struggle is
not limited to Islamists and nationalists.” This is, of course, a major fallacy
because these “atheist patriarchs” do not rely on scientific theories to
marginalize and undermine women, but rather benefit from the same privileges of
masculinity that Islam provided for them for centuries.
4- The scene where we find veiled, religious women and some bearded,
religious men claim the adoption of feminism is one of two possibilities:
either the Islamic movements are trying hard to absorb the audience of the
feminist movement – who are accused of atheism and being atheists for the mere
demands for the most basic rights of females - or these Muslim women, adopting
the emancipation of women will reach a crossroad, where they must choose
between (Islam) or their freedom and dignity.
5- Let us remember the lessons of history: Mustafa Kemal Ataturk, in Turkey
consolidated women’s rights by marginalizing the role of religion and clergymen
- notice that the management of religion is carried out by males - and so did
Muhammad Reza and his son, the Shah of Iran, marginalizing religion in Iran,
and Habib Bourguiba did the same in Tunisia. When did women's rights decline in
the same countries? When Islam returned to the aforementioned countries.
6- It is possible to see some, wearing Hijab, feminists, such as Malala
Yousefzai, but they remain to be considered “heretics”, and apostates by the
majority of the religious establishment, thus, the struggle against the Islamic
tradition is essential.
In conclusion: It is our right as human
beings, and in our interest as males, to get the best life partner for us
through the emancipation of women. We, males, should remember that it is our
duty, as rational beings, to support women without showing even the slightest
sign that such a contribution is an endowment of any kind. When females are
freed from the Islamic, social, sales of girls in male-made deals of marriages,
only then, such countries will improve.
Wednesday, September 2, 2020
Joy Reid Should Not Apologize for Stating the Truth of the Islamic World
I know what kind of hardship an American voter is facing on November 3rd, especially if they have a great deal of trust in scientific methodology and a belief in Humanism. Of course, I’m not voting Republican as I know for sure that the Republican Party has decided to adopt the platform of a monarch and the Islamic way of doing things by mixing a series of lies and religious nonsense that is a perfect fit for uneducated people. Now, the problem with the Democrats is the fact that they make the situation worse by bringing Communists and Islamists, like Ilhan Omar and Rashida Tlaib who sound the trumpet of #Islamophobia whenever Islam or Mohammed are mentioned without a praise. Just recently, and I was listening live, Joy Reid was talking on her show on #MSNBC how Islamic dictators behave like Donald Trump and at the time I thought that CAIR Council on American-Islamic Relations will make something out of this, and I was not surprised that those people who defend Islam, not Muslims, started shouting #Islamophobia as soon as Joy Reid was done with her program.
When I was a Muslim, I was trying to become a liberal,
open-minded free thinker believing that I can be one, and remain a Muslim. I
wished to see some people who wanted to insult and criticize Mohammed and Islam
just to feel that we were living in a free society. However, I discovered that
it is impossible to follow Qur’an and the Islamic tradition verbatimly and build
a free society because Islam requires Muslims to suppress freedom of speech
if somebody else dares to mock or criticize Islam, the Prophet or the Qur’an,
and for example, according to the Sirah, the life and the actions of Mohammed,
one of the Jewish noblemen named Ka’ab bin Al-Ashraf used to say poems mocking
Mohammed and his faith and that, additionally, he flirted in his poems and
fancied lovemaking with some Muslim women. These poems made Mohammed, the
prophet of mercy, issue an order to assassinate the Poet, and that the prophet
sent someone close to Ka’ab in order to give the murderer easier access to
finishing of the poet. So, the prophet of Islam didn’t ask his community to
respond in kind to the poet, meaning in poetry, but rather decided to kill him.
For those who think that by criticizing Islam I’m implying
that Christianity is ok, I say that while it is true that Jesus is better as a
character than the vagabond Mohammed, we should not forget that Christianity
too contributed in the massacring of the Jewish people throughout its history, and
whether you are talking about Catholics, Orthodox Christians or Protestant
Christians, all of them had a hand in the killing and the persecution of the
Jews. Also, remember that Christianity considers Jesus to be the same God who
ordered Moses, Joshua and King David to commit genocide against several
nations.
I believe, like Sam Harris and the late Christopher Hitchens
that humanity needs to stand up against religion, specifically Islam for its
fundamentalism, and to adopt the humanistic, scientific, and universal approach
to solve humanity’s problems.
#JoyReid should say no to #CAIR and #MSNBC should stand with our
#FirstAmendment
Sunday, August 30, 2020
The Burning of Holy Books, Time for Muslims to Learn Freedom! And Trump too Should Learn!
Every
while, we see some angry folks of the Muslim communities in western countries
go out in an angry mode vandalizing property and terrifying people, and for
what? For a cartoon of Prophet Muhammad or as a “reaction” to a mere threat of
burning the Qur’an, the holy book of Islam, as we saw on news recently in
Sweden. The irony is that those Muslims cannot have the very freedom, they
express in secular western countries, in their original Islamic countries
because the government will shot them dead. The political move done by
right-wing Racist Christian groups seek to agitate these intolerant Islamists
in order to create an Islamic-Christian clash, in order to help Trump and
Republicans in America, and such radicals in Europe, before elections. The
radicals on both sides have something in common, and that is both consider
Secularism to be against God-and-Allah, and for that reason we see Trump and
his Republicans insist on ignoring the Wall of Separation between religion and
state, widely known and explained by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison and
constitutional commentators, in order to bring the myth of Judeo-Christian
Constitution of the United States into power. Islamists in the Middle East,
such as in Turkey, Iran, Iraq, Pakistan and Saudi Arabia, etc.…’ welcome such a
move because it gives them the justification to argue that “as the West is
eager to bring their religious heritage to the public sector, so Muslims should
do more,” which is a disaster because already there is too much Islamization in
the Middle East that such a radical view of life is a threat to the universal
peace. No one should call me an #Islamophobe because I had an Islamic education
before moving to the United States, meaning that I was a Muslim and I have
studied the religion since my teenage years. However, there is something that
we all should cherish and promote and that is that we should separate between
attacking Muslims as a group of people, which should be rejected and condemned,
and attacking the violent, hateful, and backward theology of Islam, so
criticizing Islam as an idea should be encouraged and supported, just as we
criticize any idea in free societies. Now, I saw today on TV how Trump attacked
those who burn the American flag in protest, and Trump reminds me of the Islamists
who convert anything, magically, into a sacred thing, and the next time you try
to disapprove that thing or practice, they rush to accuse you of being
offensive to that thing which they call “Holy”. I don’t approve the burning of
the American flag because for me the flag represents the identity of the
American experience, but one of the bases of American freedoms is that people
can burn the flag and the constitution as well without being subject to any
punishment. Trump shares so much with those Islamists who shout hate and
violence against some individual or a group of people, simply because they burn
a copy of the Qur’an or drawing a caricature of Mohammed. Whether the
right-wing Christian is evil or not, they have the right to burn a book, any
book, even if it’s allegedly “written by God?”. If Allah is so jealous over
Mohammed or his Qur’an, why don’t the Islamists leave revenge and punishment to
Allah? They say that God-Allah controls everything, so, why don’t you pray to
your God-Allah to show his power and send the Qur’an burners, let say, a
thunder or transform those who burn the Qur’an to monkeys? Or simply, go ahead
and burn a copy of the Bible, and everybody can go home happy. Obviously,
radical Christians and radical Muslims are using religious jealousies as a tool
for control and power. The more we ban one side from practicing one of the
normal practices of freedom, and we might even dislike these practices, the
more we put our societies into a path of fear and distrust. Evil Jesus needs
Evil Mohammed and vice versa, in order to spread the venom, it is time for
Muslims to learn how to live in a free society, and if we ban Qur’an burnings,
we will ban Salman Rushdie’s The Satanic Verses, ban gay marriage, ban
cartoons, ban every sentiment that reflects the love of freedom. Islam is an
evil religion and it has killed Muslims more than any other group. It is time
that you learn peace and leave things to God-Allah, so if he intends to punish
anyone, it is not your job to do so.
Saturday, August 29, 2020
Do Not Vote for The Czar in November 3rd, 2020
In 2016, I remember how I
used to defend some of the Republican "principles", such as small
government, allowing guns, and the promotion of strong foreign policy. So,
except for the last principle, which I still believe in, I have changed my mind
about most things that Republicans consider to be correct. In 2016 I
volunteered in Ben Carson's presidential campaign, so I went on to El Cajon
Downtown, in San Diego CA with my cousin, who is still an avid Republican, and
we would distribute some booklets about Ben Carson's life and career. But, as
time went by, and I was following the Republican's primaries at the time, I
noticed that the party was voting more and more for this guy who was full of
anger, spreading hateful speech, calling names, and owns an empire of money
made from selling women and alcohol and gambling and similar
"Un-Christian" trades. I felt at the time that Christianity is
repeating a phenomenon which I have witnessed in Iraq, and that is the religion
that claims itself as a beacon of virtue and ethical behavior is the very
institution that gives power to the most corrupt, hateful, and licentious
immoral people, you want them away from politics. I'm not saying that
Christianity is the same as Islam because I know for sure that the religion which
was born in a mixture of Greek-Judaic traditions is certainly less dangerous,
but still a menace to secular liberty, than Islam which is born in a hostile
environment and I shall explain that part bellow.
Republicans have shifted radically with the nomination of Donald
Trump towards a Christian White Nationalistic view, in a clear departure from
our secular constitution that which gave more strength to the core nature of
Americanism, which is all about "We the People" in which freedom and
justice are equally shared. Christianity, in my opinion, is more open to the
separation of state and church than Islam, not because it was divine and Islam was
Satanic, as many Christians would say, but rather because Christianity was born
in an area where the Civil Authorities had an immense degree of power and
control, as the Roman Legions were present and ready to crush any zealots, and
thus Christianity had no choice but to be an advocate of peace, whereas Islam
was born in the Arabian Peninsula and Mohammed was, like any conqueror, a
unifier of fighting tribes, so he went on promoting "peace and
justice" but only for the tribes who joined to his league of believers, in
contrast, he had no problem ordering his men to go invade, capture and bring
slaves, women, men, and children. I hope that I'm not frightening you because
as you know, most religions have such a history and as Islam was ok with
slavery as was Christianity and Judaism.
What I'm trying to say here is that America should avoid voting
Republicans, at least in 2020 because the separation of state and church have
been made in question by this Republican Party which promotes bringing a Judeo-Christian
identity into a system that was established on secular values, and as they ask
you more to vote based on biblical motivations, be sure that they want to
distract the attention of the American people from corruption and the
tax-evasion going on among Christian, and other religious groups, billionaires
and super-rich people.
In the RNC Convention, there was a great deal of mixing religion
with politics, such as crying for unborn babies, that Democrats are trying to
ban God and the bible, that America was found on Judeo-Christian principles and
values. and so on. But if you read the U.S. Constitution, you will find no
mention of Jesus, Christ, Moses or any appeal to any deity, and thus one can argue
that our system considers the state to be a secular institution and the
founding fathers did exactly just that because they believed that in order to
keep tyranny away, gods and religions should be considered part of the personal
freedoms and rights, whereas the government should deal with all the citizens
regardless of faith, religion.
When COVID19 began ravaging America
about March and April 2020, remember that Trump waited 3 months spewing
arguments and shouting like a troublemaking kid: #FAKENEWS, Lies, and #Hoax! Later,
he politicized wearing masks, and argued that we should not do more testing,
despite the fact that doctors and professionals suggested exactly what he was
opposing. When he discovered that he destroyed our economy by his recklessness
and carelessness, Trump suggested a miracle is going to happen and the
virus will just suddenly go away! Trump is not the first king and monarch who
believed that God has given them magical powers because, for example, the last
of the Czars, and I suggest that you watch a TV Show made in 2019 under the
very same title (last of the Czars), believed that the head of the
Russian Empire and the father of the ruling family Czar Nicholas II had
divine powers, not just to rule, but even to heal leprosy, the irony was that Nicholas
II was devastated by the fact that his son was ill with hemophilia, and he had
nothing to do in order to save his son from danger. My point here is that the
Republican Party and its senators are enabling someone like Czar Nicholas II with
his full arrogance and imagined powers to lead America into the carnage that is
avoidable, if they just to care about the interests of the American people. Czar
Nicholas II ended his career by causing the destruction of the Russian state
and the raging of the Civil War between his Christian based Aristocracy and the
Communists, and he died a horrendous death with his family and kids.
I’m not saying that Trump will meet a similar fate because Trump is lucky that he isn’t a Czar or a Monarch, though he is behaving like one, so the American people will not have to assassinate him. Yet, the other part is still possible to happen, and that is the likelihood of America descending into chaos and Civil War. Trump warns us that division and destruction is coming if Biden win in November, while ignoring the very fact that this is happening during his first term. So, imagine him emboldened with a second term. If the rational people of America hesitate going to elections on November the 3rd, it is very possible that the fate of America would be in the hands of a small minority that believes in a cult of Rich Messiah, Trump, and we don’t know what kind of disaster awaits us in 2021 if Trump got his second term. So, #Vote2020 and vote wisely.
Friday, August 28, 2020
The American Elections in 2020 and the Struggle between 300 and Joker
I have been trying since I took American History classes, to have a better understanding, and even to better explain America’s political scene nowadays, and I could not find better than seeing it through two American movies: Joker (2019) and 300 (2006). The struggle between the two was fierce even before they have been launched, and each one of them represents an entire series of generational struggle that goes all the way to the French Revolution. If Hitler and Stalin were alive, the former would have applauded 300, whereas the latter would have disliked Joker vehemently. Joker, the movie, is a project of a revolution, an angry individual who finds the status quo appalling and resentful, living in a depressing environment where nobody cares or hears him anyway. When Arthur Fleck (the protagonist of Joker) (Joaquin Phoenix) has a session with his psychological therapist, he discovers that she has been repeating to him the same questions in every session, and slowly he finds out that his dream of becoming a standup comedian is everything but achievable. Now, the joker discovers that his mother is not his real mother, that she adopted him, yet she lets him been abused by her boyfriend when he was a child and that the rich man mayor of the city, whom his mother claims to be his illegitimate father. In this movie, it is the individual who suffers; it’s the individual who should be the focus of our care.
in the movie 300, which has a sequel, it is
absolutely the opposite. 300 movie would have won the prize for the best moving
picture in Nazi Germany, as it depicts a utopia similar to Plato’s Republic
that was inspired by the Kingdom of Sparta, where the majority of males served
in an army, and where there was no place for individualistic ambitions or
dreams; where weak infants left to die under mountains’ snow; a city where
everything serves the common good; everything should be perfect as physically
as mentally. In 300 we find that perfection is not described only as rational
thing, but that it should be accepted as physical as well, and in contrast in
the same movie, we see the forces of tyranny and enslavement depicted as
deformed, gay-like, and mostly black, and even the one Greek who betrays his
country and his people, Ephilates, is bodily deformed and ugly. In Joker there
is no such a thing as to be called perfect, and there is no foreign enemy on
the door, probably a normal feeling of safety from foreign foes in a city that
lives on the shores of an ocean, and it all revolves around the common man. In
Joker, there is no King Leonidas, no foreign enemies, no gay-like treasonous
characters, however, there is an enemy from inside, a fear of street
delinquents, corrupt politicians, who gain their money and power from a corrupt
administration, and backed by a media that anesthetizes society with a faulty
feelings of happiness and fun. Again, in 300 there is a show of equality and
perfection in a united body of warriors, and certainly, there is no place for
weakness or individuality, and the mixing of what history wants to say and what
the movie’s makers want to say is vague and blurred to the utmost. It is
historically proven that black slavery was not of existence at
the time of Greeks, until the late medieval centuries, yet we see a heavy use
of African-Black features on the Persian side of Tyranny, and to do that, the
moviemakers intentionally created a dichotomy between (Strong White) Freedom
versus (Weak and Black) Slavery based on racial, and sexual binaries. 300
also has an enemy from inside, Theron, who is a corrupt politician and wants to
take sexual advantage of Leonidas’ wife, Queen Gorgo (Lena Headey), a theme
very similar to the Nazi concept of protecting motherhood and female’s nature from
an alleged Jewish-Black abuse. Theron is the enemy-inside who should be killed,
as the enemies-inside in Joker are killed, but the difference between the two
is that in 300, a nation of perfect statures, healthy environment, and with the backing of wholeheartedly fighting warriors, exists, and that if we just to
remove Ephilates, the deformed, and Theron the corrupt politician, we will get
our perfect society. But are Spartans free as shown in the movie? In historical
Sparta, as in the cinematic one, there were no arts, no music, no poetry or an
appeal to emotions except for that which glorifies the state and its armed
forces. In Sparta, the individual does not exist as an entity and individuals
serve only the common good, whereas in Joker, everything revolves and orbits
the hero, who despite his madness is a vividly depicted individual who knows
that an entire society of suffering individuals does exist outside. Joker is
the individual who wants to be happy and laugh from the deepness of his heart,
not the way others want him to do, but to laugh genuinely; when he laughs disorderly,
that laugh is a cry for help, and no one helps him. 300 is absurd and sorry
for using such a term, but there is no word that could describe a dead concept
as does this movie, which is nothing but a product of a Platonic Utopia that
which detached from reality. In comparison, Joker, despite its revolutionary
end, and the violence that comes with it, remains anti-tyrannical in nature; anti-patriarchy;
anti-matriarchy; anti-authority in general.
Let me take you beyond the cinematic
nature of the two movies, to the politics behind it.
For me, Donald Trump is closer to
the 300 movie, not to say that he isn’t a joker in the sense that he has no care
for the rule of law, but because he repeats terms like beautiful, perfect,
wonderful, awesome; he even described World War II as “beautiful war”, showing interest only in the strong, rich, and super healthy billionaires, thus, the low- bourgeoisie and the poor common American should not vote for the super-rich,
selfish party. However, we should follow the Joker movie example in dealing
with the Democratic Party, which should be kept away from falling to the utopia
of Communist young utopians such as @AOC, despite my respect for her, and also,
we should push the Democrats to work on a free-market system that still
believes in equality and prevents monopolies, as the Republicans are working
hard to create a wider gap between the poor and the rich.
Vote #Biden2020